By using the barren Atacama Desert in Chile as a stand-in for Mars, researchers have shown that it’s possible to use an autonomous rover-mounted drill to detect life beneath a desolate surface. Encouragingly, the test resulted in the discovery of a resilient microorganism—exactly the kind of creature that could lurk deep beneath the Martian surface.
New research published today in Frontiers in Microbiology describes a trial NASA rover mission in Chile’s Atacama Desert that could mirror a future mission to Mars. The experimental rover and drill, designed by Carnegie Mellon’s Robotics Institute and funded by NASA, successfully recovered microorganisms beneath the surface — specifically, a hardy, salt-resistant bacteria. The test provided justification for a life-hunting mission to Mars, but the experiment was not without its challenges and limitations. As the new research showed, finding life on Mars—if it even exists — will require some serious technological innovations, a lot of cash, and a bit of luck.
Billions of years ago, Mars featured a temperate climate and liquid water at its surface, providing a potential environment for life to emerge. Today, life is unlikely to exist at the surface. Lethal levels of radiation bathe the Red Planet, and its tortured surface contains scant traces of liquid water. During the Martian summer, daytime temperatures near the equator can reach a balmy 20 degrees Celsius, but at night drop to a frighteningly cold -100 degrees C.
Conditions beneath the surface are a different story, according to Stephen Pointing, a researcher at Yale-NUS College in Singapore and the lead author of the new study. Just below the surface, rocks and sediment provide shelter from the extreme conditions above, providing a potential habitat for life.
As Pointing explained to Gizmodo, there’s no place on Earth quite like the surface of Mars, but the ground beneath the Atacama Desert in Chile offers a decent analogue.
“Some of the most Mars-like soils on Earth are in the Atacama Desert,” said Pointing. “There is very little water input to the desert and soils have become very nutrient-poor and extremely salty over time, and chemically they resemble the soils on Mars in several ways. In preparation for future missions to Mars we use places such as the Atacama Desert to test theories about the distribution of life and new technologies to search for life.”
For the experiment, Pointing and his colleagues deployed an autonomous four-wheeled rover equipped with a robotic drill, which successfully recovered subsurface sediment samples from a depth of 80 centimeters. The researchers compared samples recovered by the rover to samples collected by hand. Then, using DNA sequencing, Pointing and his colleagues showed that bacterial life in the sediments recovered by both methods were similar, showing that the rover technique was a success.
That said, the bacteria weren’t evenly distributed across the desert, and instead were located in seemingly random patches. This was on account of “limited water availability, scarce nutrients, and geochemistry of the soil,” said Pointing, adding that, in the search for life on Mars, “we may be facing the biggest ever ‘find-a-needle-in-a-haystack’ problem.”
Nevertheless, the new study is the first to show that microorganisms are distributed within specific subsurface habitable zones beneath the surface of the Atacama Desert.
[referenced url=”https://gizmodo.com.au/2018/11/first-major-rain-in-centuries-triggers-wave-of-death-in-earths-driest-desert/” thumb=”https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/t_ku-large/wqqgklkks9tkmfwb6mdb.jpg” title=”First Major Rain In Centuries Triggers Wave Of Death In Earth’s Driest Desert” excerpt=”After not experiencing any meaningful amounts of precipitation for at least 500 years, Chile’s Atacama Desert is finally getting some rain. Quite unexpectedly, however, these rains—instead of fostering life—are doing the exact opposite.”]
“The surface supports a ubiquitous and unremarkable community dominated by photosynthetic Chloroflexi and these have been widely reported before,” Pointing told Gizmodo. “Just below the surface is where it starts to get interesting. We saw that with increasing depth the bacterial community became dominated by bacteria that can thrive in the extremely salty and alkaline soils. They in turn were replaced at depths down to 80 cm by a unique group of bacteria that survive by metabolizing methane as a food source.”
Excitingly, the new research shows that the subsurface of Atacama can support highly specialised microbes that could potentially survive the salty Martian soil. Moreover, Mars is known to contain copious amounts of methane at the surface, pointing to the possible presence of methane-gobbling microorganisms beneath the Martian surface, according to the new paper. An important next step for Pointing and his team will be to figure out how the subsurface microbes at Atacama are able to survive. To that end, they’re looking at possible strategies used by the bacteria to survive long periods without water and exposure to extremely salty conditions. In addition, the team would like to return to the Atacama Desert with a rover capable of drilling 2 meters down.
With all this said, it’s time for some reality checks.
The researchers successfully used a probe to detect life on Earth, which is admittedly not terribly difficult, even when the environment happens to be a desert. Life has flourished on Earth for billions of years, and it’s ubiquitous, even appearing in rock thousands of feet beneath the surface. Yes, the new research was done at a Mars-like place, but it’s still not Mars. At best, the new study presents scientific justification for a future life-hunting mission to the Red Planet, but any speculation about extant life on Mars remains just that.
Another important limitation of the new research is that the sediment samples were tested in a lab, and not by equipment on the rover itself. Pointing himself admitted this will present a major obstacle for Mars mission planners.
“For a rover on Mars there is a challenge in identifying unequivocal signs of life,” Pointing said. “The DNA sequencing method we employed is great here on Earth but is currently too complex to perform reliably on Mars. This is why indirect detection of other molecules known to be formed by living cells is probably the approach that missions to Mars will go with in the near-term.”
In other words, it would make more sense for a future rover to search for biosignatures—the remnants of biological life, such as inexplicable traces of molecular oxygen combined with methane, accumulated piles of microbes (stromatolites), and traces of fossilized waste, fat, and steroids. If anything like this could be detected, “then we would need new experimental techniques to test if any Martian bacteria were actually alive and capable of active metabolism,” said Pointing.
Lastly, and perhaps more discouragingly, there is the cost of sending such a mission to Mars. NASA and ESA are planning to send rovers to Mars within the next few years, but it’s not clear if either agency has the technological capacity or funds to organise a mission capable of returning Martian rock and soil samples to Earth for analysis. As SpaceNews reported just this week, NASA is unlikely to return Mars samples in the 2020s, primarily due to the expense.
Pointing admitted that a return mission would be expensive, costing hundreds of millions of dollars.
“However, the research will help us to address one of the biggest questions we can possibly ask,” he said. “Is Earth the only planet that supports life?”