<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Gizmodo Australia</provider_name><provider_url>https://gizmodo.com.au</provider_url><author_name>Alissa Walker</author_name><author_url>https://gizmodo.com.au/author/alissawalker-usa/</author_url><title>Smartphones Could Fill The Gaps In An Earthquake Early Warning Network</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ILaHZ6c9yF"&gt;&lt;a href="https://gizmodo.com.au/2015/04/smartphones-could-fill-the-gaps-in-an-earthquake-early-warning-network/"&gt;Smartphones Could Fill The Gaps In An Earthquake Early Warning Network&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://gizmodo.com.au/2015/04/smartphones-could-fill-the-gaps-in-an-earthquake-early-warning-network/embed/#?secret=ILaHZ6c9yF" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Smartphones Could Fill The Gaps In An Earthquake Early Warning Network&#x201D; &#x2014; Gizmodo Australia" data-secret="ILaHZ6c9yF" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://gizmodo.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/11/yovshclbnv5oarndsspw.jpg?quality=75</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>640</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>377</thumbnail_height><description>An early warning system for earthquakes can&#x2019;t come soon enough for the US, which is lagging behind other seismically active countries like Mexico and Japan. But for an early warning system to be effective it needs lots of sensors, which can be expensive to install and maintain. A new study says we might not need [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
