<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Gizmodo Australia</provider_name><provider_url>https://gizmodo.com.au</provider_url><author_name>Victoria Song</author_name><author_url>https://gizmodo.com.au/author/victoriasong-usa/</author_url><title>No One Wants a Smartwatch With Two Cameras</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="zj6UYn1OcA"&gt;&lt;a href="https://gizmodo.com.au/2021/09/no-one-wants-a-smartwatch-with-two-cameras/"&gt;No One Wants a Smartwatch With Two Cameras&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://gizmodo.com.au/2021/09/no-one-wants-a-smartwatch-with-two-cameras/embed/#?secret=zj6UYn1OcA" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;No One Wants a Smartwatch With Two Cameras&#x201D; &#x2014; Gizmodo Australia" data-secret="zj6UYn1OcA" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://gizmodo.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/03/949f739ea8f9db124b20c115d6b0a3b5.jpg?quality=75</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1600</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>899</thumbnail_height><description>Of the myriad reasons why Google&#x2019;s Wear OS platform has struggled over the years, Qualcomm&#x2019;s sluggish smartwatch chips are largely to blame. The chipmaker&#x2019;s current Snapdragon Wear 4100+ platform is over a year old, running outdated process tech, and likely won&#x2019;t run the upcoming Wear OS 3 nearly as well as Samsung&#x2019;s newest watch chip. [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
