China’s New Megarocket Design Shows NASA’s SLS Is Already Obsolete

China’s New Megarocket Design Shows NASA’s SLS Is Already Obsolete

Reusable rockets, whether large or small, are the future, and as a newly unveiled model of a Long March 9 launch vehicle suggests, Chinese rocket scientists are coming around to the idea.

A team in China presented its updated model at the ongoing Zhuhai Airshow, as reported in SpaceNews. The new Long March 9 design, with its grid fins and noticeably absent side boosters, evokes SpaceX’s Starship, and with it, thoughts of reusability. Speaking to China Central Television, Liu Bing, design director at the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT), confirmed the new direction but said the design hasn’t been finalised, according to SpaceNews.

This development attracted the attention of Elon Musk, who spearheaded the concept and proved it could it be done. “Rockets that aren’t reusable have no future,” the SpaceX CEO tweeted in response to the SpaceNews article.

The SpaceX CEO didn’t call out NASA’s expendable Space Launch System by name, though he might as well have. The 97.84 m-tall (98-metre) SLS rocket, along with the Orion spacecraft, cost more than $US50 ($69) billion to develop, and each launch of the Artemis rocket is expected to cost upwards of $US4.1 ($6) billion — a price that inspector general Paul Martin has called “unsustainable.”

SLS has yet to leave the launch pad, and it’s already obsolete. China, it would appear, is not willing to march down that same path. Mind you, NASA made the decision to go with an expendable megarocket 12 years ago, in a decision guided heavily by politics and budgetary constraints. It wasn’t obvious to everyone back then that reusable rockets were feasible and safe. It certainly wasn’t obvious to NASA in 2010, but perhaps it should have been, given that the space agency is so celebrated for its innovations and accomplishments.

More on this story: Why Hydrogen Leaks Continue to Be a Major Headache for NASA Launches

China first proposed the idea of building an expendable super-heavy launch vehicle in 2018 for the purpose of transporting crews and cargo to Earth orbit and the Moon. Early mock-ups leaned toward NASA’s Space Launch System, which is poised to make its first launch on November 16.

The original plan was to have the Long March 9 deliver 100 metric tons to low Earth orbit, but China appears to be thinking bigger — both in terms of the rocket’s power and its recyclability. The upgraded plan, says SpaceNews, is for the Long March 9 to consist of three stages and be capable of lifting 150 metric tons to LEO. The rocket will stand 107.90 m tall (108 meters) and weigh 4,180 metric tons.

“In recent years,” SpaceNews writes, senior CALT officials have “presented new concepts for the Long March 9, apparently in reaction to developments in reusability demonstrated by SpaceX.” Indeed, the company’s Falcon 9 is famous for its reusable first stage, but Starship — the heir apparent to the world’s most powerful rocket — will be fully reusable. No date has been set for the first launch of the fully stacked two-stage Starship, but it could happen later this year.

SpaceNews says the Chinese rocket is scheduled for its inaugural launch around 2030, but given that the design has not yet been finalised and that China has never performed a controlled vertical landing of a rocket, that seems wildly optimistic. According to the South China Morning Post, the Long March 9 will enter into operation around 2035, which sounds a bit more realistic. A recent hot fire test of the 500-metric-ton-thrust YF-130 engine, which will eventually power the Long March 9, suggests China is making progress.

As for SLS, only time well tell if the expendable expensive rocket has a future. Congress and American tax payers may find themselves fed up with the concept and opt for Elon’s solution instead.

More: Artemis 1: To Boldly Go Where Four RS-25 Engines Have Gone Many Times Before.


The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

It’s the most popular NBN speed in Australia for a reason. Here are the cheapest plans available.

At Gizmodo, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.