Tesla Wants To Pause A Racial Bias Lawsuit So Its Other Racial Bias Lawsuits Can Play Out First

Tesla Wants To Pause A Racial Bias Lawsuit So Its Other Racial Bias Lawsuits Can Play Out First

Tesla has asked a U.S. judge to kindly pause one of its ongoing lawsuits regarding racial bias and the harassment of Black workers, Reuters reports. Why put a pause on something that important? Well, Tesla has a few other similar harassment lawsuits it wants to get cleared up first.

The lawsuit that Tesla wants to put on hold was filed last September. In it, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleged that Tesla has tolerated a hostile working environment toward its employees of colour at its Fremont, California, factory by failing to investigate complaints of racial conduct and firing any employees who raise concerns about their treatment. The lawsuit was raised because the EEOC was unable to negotiate with Tesla.

While the EEOC lawsuit addresses similar claims as two other lawsuits that Tesla is currently involved in, this one involves action brought by a federal agency. The other cases involve a 2017 class-action lawsuit brought by workers of Tesla’s Fremont factory, and a 2022 lawsuit brought by a California civil rights agency. Both of the previous cases are playing out in state court and involve California’s specific anti-discrimination policies. The EEOC suit addresses a different federal law banning workplace harassment.

Tesla’s lawyers petitioned to postpone the EEOC trial until the other two lawsuits are resolved, stating, “Simultaneous prosecution of the state court actions and this case will involve substantial duplication of effort, create a significant risk of inconsistent court rulings, and result in an inefficient and wasteful use of judicial resources.” That’s likely in part because Tesla feels the claims of harassment are a “false narrative.” Tesla also claims that the EEOC “rushed” the lawsuit as part of “toxic interagency competition” with the aforementioned California civil rights agency.

There is precedent for Tesla’s request. The Colorado River abstention doctrine is a legal principle that allows federal courts to hold off on hearing a case while similar cases regarding the same issues are playing out in state courts.


Want more Aussie car news? Here’s every EV we’ve reviewed in the last two years, all the EVs we can expect down under soon, and our guide to finding EV chargers across the country. Check out our dedicated Cars tab for more.


The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

It’s the most popular NBN speed in Australia for a reason. Here are the cheapest plans available.

At Gizmodo, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.